diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index b5c7985..23be6ea 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -20,14 +20,16 @@
                              typically uses "1:2" to mean "One part of
                              the developer added to two parts water."
                              Ilford likes to use "1+2" to mean the
-                             same thing.  I've used Kodak's notation
-                             throughout this document.
+                             same thing.  I've used both here interchangeably.
 
 **UPDATES TO THIS DOCUMENT**: Please note that I periodically update
                               this document with new findings.  If
                               you've already read it in the past, you
                               can skip to the [Updates](#updates)
-                              section at the end of this document
+                              section at the end of this document.
+                              Many of these Updates change the
+                              recommendations in the original text, so
+                              reading them is a good idea.
 
 
 
@@ -72,7 +74,8 @@
   contrast too much.  EMA for an hour with three agitations (90
   seconds initial, 10 seconds at 21 & 41 minutes) at 1.5:1:300 seems
   to work better.  At this dilution, you'll get about 1/3 stop less
-  than box ASA speeds.
+  than box ASA speeds.  (See the [Updates](#updates) section for
+  other ideas.)
 
 * When faced with a low contrast or short Subject Brightness range, a
   lower dilution semistand (1.5:1:250) for an hour seems to work best.
@@ -890,6 +893,22 @@
 makes the results ugly and I would advise against it.
 
 
+### Update 0-27-2024: Rethinking EMA Times And Dilutions
+
+The original EMA recommendations in this document called for highly
+dilute development for an hour with intermittent agitation throughout.
+After more testing, I determined that this still has a tendency
+to overdevelop (blow out) the highlights.
+
+A possibly better way to approach EMA - and one more in line with what
+others have documented for EMA - is to simply reduce overall time and
+increase frequency of agitation.
+
+For example, I got very good results with 35mm Plus-X using Pyrocat-HD
+5:3:500 with an initial 90 seconds agitation and 5 seconds at the 7,
+14, and 21 minute marks, ending development at 28 minutes.  This
+seemed to control the highlights well and promoted strong edge effects.
+
 
 ## Copyright And Use