diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 59dc122..90889a4 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -196,11 +196,12 @@
 * Using specialty tubes made of PVC plumber's pipe to hold the negative during standing
 * Using minimal contact hangers to hold the film during standing
 
-Formally and properly, stand development should be done with the
+~~Formally and properly, stand development should be done with the
 negatives laying flat in a tray or the equivalent.  They should *stand
-laying down* not hanging vertically in a tank.  My testing suggests
-that this is not absolutely necessary and at least one other approach
-will work.
+laying down* not hanging vertically in a tank.~~
+
+(This turns out to not be such a great idea.  See [Updates](#updates)
+section at the end of this document for more commentary on tray processing.)
 
 It's also worth noting that the photographers who pioneered this
 approach a hundred plus years ago were using very different films and
@@ -515,7 +516,7 @@
 * The film developed nicely with no evidence of bromide drag and hit
   full box ASA as one might expect.
 
-* Compared to Pyrocat-HD negatives, this seems to so very slightly more
+* Compared to Pyrocat-HD negatives, there seems to so very slightly more
   grain (not surprising) compared to other ASA 100 films.  However, I've
   not processed Arista 100 rollfilm in Pyrocat-HD so it could also just
   be how the film is made.
@@ -545,6 +546,50 @@
 be fun to try super dilute D-76 some time.
 
 
+### Update 1-9-2022: What About Tray Processing?
+
+When I first started on this journey, the common wisdom was that
+laying sheets of film flat in a tray was one of the preferred ways to
+do low agitation development.
+
+After extensive fiddling around and some limited attempts at doing
+tray processing, I recommend NOT doing this for several reasons:
+
+* It is very difficult to tray process multiple sheets without
+  scratching them.
+
+* Practially speaking, you cannot stack negatives in a tray for low
+  agitation. Each sheet's emulsion needs to be in full contact with
+  the developer for the shadows to fully develop.
+
+* My testing strongly suggests that gravity plays a significant role
+  in draining away development byproducts.  I've not tested this, but
+  I question whether laying a sheet of film face down will have enough
+  gravitational effect to pull the byproducts to the bottom of the
+  tray.  Perhaps this would work with a deep tray and lots of
+  developer, but this seems like a clumsy way to deal with the issue.
+
+In short, tray stand processing may work, but it's clumsy and
+unnecessary.  For best results, just use minimal suspension to hang
+the film vertically well above the bottom of the tank.
+
+
+### Update 1-9-2022: More On The Use Of Reels
+
+Per the previous update, there is (at least in my experience)
+compelling evidence that you reduce the risk of bromide drag when you
+let gravity pull away the development artifacts from the film.  With
+reels, this means suspending them off the bottom of the tank a bit.
+
+I've been using the faucet adapter that comes with the Kodak Tray
+Siphon to do this.  I stick the narrow end into the bottom of the reel
+and slide the lift rod through it.  This raises the reel off the tank
+floor about 1 1/2 inches or so.  You could also probably use a small
+inverted funnel to do this. Another possibility would be to get an
+appropriate sized rubber stopper and drill a hole through it to make
+room for the lift rod.
+
+
 ## Copyright And Use
 
 All content here is Copyright (c) 2021 TundraWare Inc., Des Plaines, IL USA