diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 0fd7fe0..0dbfacd 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -284,10 +284,20 @@
   Normal development worked fine.  To my surprise, Semistand was OK as
   well.  I was expecting bromide drag problems because of the way the
   reels support the film.  Again, I think strong initial agitation
-  helped here.  I've also noticed a considerable difference of reel
-  spacing from different manufacturers.  If you are going to do 35mm
-  or 120 this way, I'd stick with the old Nikor reels.  They're a bit
-  expensive but widely available on eBay.
+  helped here.
+
+  I've also noticed a considerable difference of reel spacing from
+  different manufacturers.  If you are going to do 35mm or 120 this
+  way, I'd stick with the old Nikor reels.  They're a bit expensive
+  but widely available on eBay.  I'd also recommend doing these
+  smaller formats in an open tank, rather than the smaller stainless
+  tanks that are normally used with these.  Why?  Because you'll get
+  more developer around the film no matter what the agitation model.
+  It does mean working in the dark, though.  Under no circumstance
+  would I use the adjustable plastic reels sometimes found in cheaper
+  kit.  The ridges for holding the film in place are tall and inhibit
+  smooth developer flow. Using this just begs for bromide drag
+  problems.
 
 * Stand and Semistand did best with the `1.5:1:200` dilution.  EMA did
   best with the `1.5:1:150` dilutions.  This makes sense, since EMA