diff --git a/README.md b/README.md
index 5a72257..9af1efb 100644
--- a/README.md
+++ b/README.md
@@ -882,30 +882,6 @@
 results and for the same reasons.
 
 
-### Update 9-19-2024: Kodak Double X And Standing Development
-
-After a lot of testing (100s of shots), I have concluded that Kodak
-Double X does not like highly dilute developers like PMK Pyro and
-Pyrocat-HD (either that, or it doesn't like Pyro, I don't know).
-And... it *really* hates standing development with Pyrocat-HD.
-Doing so yields very grainy results with gritty looking midtones.
-
-For Double X, I've found the following to work much better:
-
-* If you want to do semistand, use D-23 1+3 for 30min with one
-   midpoint agitation.
-
-* For conventional development, use HC-110B for 6min or
-  D-76 1+1 for 7.5 min.
-
-Of these, the D-76 gave best tonality and minimal grain, though the other two
-were close.  Standing in D-23 gives excellent results with minimal grain and
-has the benefit of compensating the highlights and expanding the midtones.
-
-Some combination of Double X, high dilution, and long standing times
-makes the results ugly and I would advise against it.
-
-
 ### Update 09-27-2024: Rethinking EMA Times And Dilutions
 
 The original EMA recommendations in this document called for highly